Media finally notices that the RCP 8.5 climate model is over-hyped science fiction – Watts Up With That?

Media finally notices that the RCP 8.5 climate model is over-hyped science fiction – Watts Up With That?


First, a science fiction preview of DOOM courtesy of the RCP8.5 model:

https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/coupled-physical-model-cm3/

Some sensibility from the WSJ:

Climate Media vs. Climate Science

The good news is that scientists themselves have started to correct the record.

By Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.

Joe Biden has put a presidential imprimatur on climate change being an existential threat, and he doesn’t mean in the Jean-Paul Sartre sense of man’s search for meaning in an uncomforting universe.

He means the end of humanity, a claim nowhere found in climate science.

This is odd because the real news today is elsewhere. Its movement may be ocean-liner-like, the news may be five years old before the New York Times notices it, but the climate community has been backing away from a worst-case scenario peddled to the public for years as “business as usual.”

A drumroll moment was Zeke Hausfather and Glen Peter’s 2020 article in the journal Nature partly headlined: “Stop using the worst-case scenario for climate warming as the most likely outcome.”

This followed the 2017 paper by Justin Ritchie and Hadi Dowlatabadi asking why climate scenarios posit implausible increases in coal burning a century from now. And I could go on. Roger Pielke Jr. and colleagues show how the RCP 8.5 scenario was born to give modelers a high-emissions scenario to play with, and how it came to be embraced despite being at odds with every real-world indicator concerning the expected course of future emissions.

Full article here (paywalled) https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-media-vs-climate-science-11618355224

Dr. Roger Pielke Jr had this to say on Twitter:





Source link

Similar Articles

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Advertismentspot_img

Instagram

Most Popular